Cytoplasm/.gitea/workflows/compile.yaml
Jordan Bancino d0969d0dd7
All checks were successful
Compile Cytoplasm / Compile Cytoplasm (x86_64, freebsd-v14.0) (push) Successful in 15s
Compile Cytoplasm / Compile Cytoplasm (x86, debian-v12.4) (push) Successful in 19s
Compile Cytoplasm / Compile Cytoplasm (x86, alpine-v3.19) (push) Successful in 17s
Compile Cytoplasm / Compile Cytoplasm (x86_64, debian-v12.4) (push) Successful in 17s
Compile Cytoplasm / Compile Cytoplasm (x86, netbsd-v9.3) (push) Successful in 16s
Compile Cytoplasm / Compile Cytoplasm (x86_64, alpine-v3.19) (push) Successful in 15s
Compile Cytoplasm / Compile Cytoplasm (x86_64, netbsd-v9.3) (push) Successful in 19s
Compile Cytoplasm / Compile Cytoplasm (x86, freebsd-v14.0) (push) Successful in 17s
Compile Cytoplasm / Compile Cytoplasm (x86_64, openbsd-v7.4) (push) Successful in 21s
Add a simple CI workflow for compiling Cytoplasm. (#27)
This will allow us to pick up compiler warnings from other systems, mainly 32-bit ones. 32-bit systems have different integer sizes that cause all kinds of warnings that we should really address.

Reviewed-on: #27
2024-01-13 11:08:44 -05:00

25 lines
1,000 B
YAML

name: Compile Cytoplasm
run-name: Compile Cytoplasm on ${{ gitea.actor }}
on: [push]
jobs:
"Compile Cytoplasm":
strategy:
matrix:
os: [debian-v12.4, alpine-v3.19, openbsd-v7.4, freebsd-v14.0, netbsd-v9.3]
arch: [x86, x86_64]
exclude:
# 32-bit OpenBSD does not behave well in QEMU. Even when using
# QEMU to emulate i386, it utilizes 100% of its CPU core and is
# still extremely sluggish. Thus, we don't have a working 32-bit
# OpenBSD runner, so exclude it from the matrix configuration.
- os: openbsd-v7.4
arch: x86
runs-on: ["${{ matrix.os }}", "${{ matrix.arch }}"]
steps:
- name: Check out repository
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Configure Cytoplasm
run: ./configure
- name: Build Cytoplasm
run: make